12 December 2025

Bitcoin’s market is flashing a curious contradiction. In the past month, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to Bitcoin saw record-breaking outflows—roughly $3.5-$3.7 billion was pulled and this has been the largest monthly exodus on record. At the very same time, major Wall Street institutions are finally warming up to crypto. In a landmark move, Bank of America told its wealth clients that a “modest allocation” of around 1-4% in digital assets like Bitcoin could now be appropriate. Investors are left scratching their heads: How can money be rushing out of Bitcoin funds just as big banks are inviting money in?

This paradox captures the tension of the current crypto cycle. On one hand, short-term sentiment is shaky—headlines scream of volatility and crowded exits and evokes a déjà vu of past sell-offs. On the other hand, long-term adoption is quietly accelerating—the kind of structural progress that is not always obvious in price charts. If you feel whiplash, you are not alone. Previous cycles had similar head-fakes: often, when speculative fever breaks and traders bail, the foundations for the next phase are being laid behind the scenes. The key is understanding why short-term flows can diverge from long-term fundamentals, and what that says about a maturing market.

Top-3 stories of the week:

1

2

3

The newsletter is put together by Giottus Crypto Platform. You can read all the previous issues of Cryptogram here.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you?

WEEKLY MACROS

• Total crypto market cap - $3.14 trillion - UP 0.3%    

• Bitcoin price - $92,183 - UP 0.2%

• The dollar index (DXY) - 98.4 - DOWN 0.5%

• Bitcoin Dominance - 59.32% -  UNCHANGED

• Crypto Fear and Greed Index - 29 - Market is in Fear

THE HOT TAKE

The Story Behind the Outflows: How Bitcoin Is Growing Up in a Volatile Year

Short-Term Flows vs. Long-Term Adoption

November’s ETF outflows—roughly $3.7 billion, the largest on record—hit just as prices pulled back sharply, creating the impression of an asset under pressure. Yet at that same moment, Bank of America was moving in the opposite direction, formally opening access to Bitcoin ETFs across its wealth platforms and publicly endorsing a 1-4% allocation for clients comfortable with volatility. In effect, one of the U.S.’s biggest financial institutions validated Bitcoin’s place in portfolios at the precise point when trading data made it look most embattled.

Why do these long-horizon shifts often surface in moments of short-term turbulence? Part of the answer is that institutions operate on different clocks, laying groundwork quietly while traders react to daily price moves. The pattern isn’t new: even in the depths of 2018’s bear market, firms like Fidelity and ICE were building digital-asset infrastructure as retail sentiment collapsed. The lesson is that headline flows and monthly losses can create a one-dimensional picture. What appears contradictory is instead a hallmark of an asset transitioning toward maturity, where short-term traders and long-term allocators interpret the same moment in fundamentally different ways.

Two Tribes: Who’s Selling and Who’s Buying?

Short-term sellers right now are the fast-money tribe—trading firms, hedge funds, momentum desks, and arbitrage players who live by intraday swings. They piled in as Bitcoin surged, then rushed to unwind as November’s volatility snapped crowded trades like the spot-futures basis. Much of the record outflow was simply tactical money fleeing when conditions shifted, the kind of reflexive exit that defines this group’s behaviour.

The buyers (or steady holders) are the long-horizon allocators—wealth managers, institutions, and family offices guided by frameworks rather than price spikes. Bank of America’s new allocation guidance unlocks slow, deliberate flows, not day-to-day surges, and long-term holders largely stayed put, with over 61% of Bitcoin supply unmoved for a year. 

Macro Crosswinds Behind the Volatility

The broader stage in late 2025 was unsteady enough to rattle any short-term trader. A “hawkish” 0.25% Fed rate cut — divided vote, no promise of more easing, and lingering inflation worries — injected uncertainty instead of relief. Add to that a sudden wobble in the AI trade, with Oracle’s surprise earnings miss and spending spike dragging tech lower and briefly pulling Bitcoin toward $90K, and the mood across risk assets turned skittish.

Seasonal thin liquidity only amplified the swings. With year-end volumes drying up, even routine flows hit prices harder, making every move feel like turbulence in thinner air. This cocktail of a cautious Fed, shaky tech sentiment and shallow market depth made short-term players quick to sell and brace for noise, while long-term allocators largely saw it for what it was — temporary macro clutter that didn’t alter Bitcoin’s bigger arc.e headlines shifted from negative (e.g. ETF outflows in Nov) to neutral/positive. 

Decoding ETF Outflows: Not All “Selling” Is What It Seems

ETF outflows can look terrifying at first glance, but in practice they rarely mean what the headline implies. Billions leaving Bitcoin ETFs in November created the illusion of a mass investor exit, yet much of that movement was mechanical rather than emotional. A big driver was the unwinding of basis trades—a popular arbitrage where funds bought spot ETF shares and shorted futures to pocket the spread. When that spread compressed, these players simply redeemed ETF shares and closed their hedges. The data registers this as “huge outflows,” but there’s often no actual Bitcoin dumped into the market. It’s just tactical repositioning. Recent analyses support this, showing that mid-October to November outflows aligned with these arbitrage unwinds rather than a broad collapse in conviction.

A crucial nuance is that ETF redemptions don’t equal Bitcoin liquidations. Investors might exit an ETF to switch to lower-fee products, move into direct custody, harvest tax losses, or rebalance after a strong rally. In a maturing market, these are normal portfolio mechanics. Authorized participants (the institutions managing ETF share creation/redemption) also buffer flows, meaning ETF outflows often reflect prior price weakness rather than create new selling pressure. And importantly, November’s record outflows came after record inflows earlier in the year—a natural ebb after a powerful run-up. Some institutions simply took profits or trimmed exposure to reset risk. So when you see a headline like “$3.7B pulled from Bitcoin ETFs,” the takeaway shouldn’t be “investors are fleeing Bitcoin.” More often, it means strategies have rotated, structures have shifted, and investors are adjusting their wrappers — not their long-term belief in the asset.

Why Wealth Management May Matter More Than ETF Flows

Wealth management is quietly reshaping Bitcoin’s long game. Bank of America’s decision to let thousands of advisors recommend Bitcoin marks a major shift in distribution—not a trading signal, but structural integration. With ETF coverage, training, and allocation frameworks rolling out, the advisor who once couldn’t mention crypto can now say, “Let’s allocate 1-4%.” That alone places Bitcoin alongside traditional assets in mainstream portfolio design.

Crucially, that 1-4% guidance is a strategic, cycle-agnostic allocation meant to broaden diversification, not chase momentum. And on platforms serving millions, even tiny portfolio slices compound over time. Wealth flows don’t surge—they seep, month after month, into IRAs, trusts, and model portfolios. BoA’s move sits within a broader pattern: Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Vanguard, and Fidelity all opening channels for crypto access. These steps form the long arc of adoption. While short-term flows swing wildly, wealth platforms are methodically embedding Bitcoin into the financial system—one advisor, one client, one percentage point at a time.

Reading the Market’s Two Timelines

• Short-term flows ≠ long-term fundamentals. Record ETF outflows reflect tactical unwinds, sentiment swings, and year-end liquidity—not a collapse in conviction. Meanwhile, wealth platforms and institutions continue expanding crypto access, signalling structural progress underneath the noise.
  

• Different players move on different clocks. Traders react to volatility in days or hours, while advisors, institutions, and long-horizon allocators shift strategy over quarters and years. Their actions can look contradictory but are simply operating on separate timelines.
  

• Adoption can rise even as prices churn. Institutional onboarding, regulatory clarity, and broader distribution pipelines can strengthen the long-term foundation even during periods when Bitcoin’s price is correcting or consolidating.
  

• Bitcoin is evolving into a two-level market. One layer trades like a high-volatility risk asset; the other is gradually institutionalizing as conservative capital tiptoes in. Both dynamics can coexist — and together, they mark a market moving toward maturity.

Key Takeaway:

For retail investors, the past month is a reminder that short-term flows can look dramatic without changing the long-term picture. Record ETF outflows were largely driven by fast-money unwinds, macro noise, and thin liquidity — all forces that traders react to in real time. These episodes can create sharp swings and unsettling headlines, but they mostly reflect the behaviour of desks that operate on hours and days, not years. For anyone investing with a longer horizon, these bursts of volatility are better viewed as surface turbulence rather than a statement on Bitcoin’s underlying trajectory.

At the same time, the structural story has never been clearer. Even as ETFs saw redemptions, major wealth platforms — from Bank of America to Fidelity — expanded access and formalised allocation frameworks, signalling that Bitcoin is steadily moving into mainstream portfolios. This “slow money” builds quietly but persistently, and it’s the kind of adoption that ultimately shapes long-term value. For retail traders, the skill is learning to separate temporary noise from foundational progress: respect the short-term signals if you’re timing entries, but anchor your conviction in the broader arc of institutional integration that continues to deepen regardless of monthly volatility.

Was this newsletter forwarded to you?

If you have any questions or feedback for us, write to us at [email protected]. You can check out the previous issues here.

Disclaimer: Crypto products and NFTs are unregulated and can be highly risky. There may be no regulatory recourse for any loss from such transactions. Please do your own research before investing and seek independent legal/financial advice if you are unsure about the investments.